AI Augmented Systems Architect
Design systems an AI can reason about: resumable ADRs, zero-trust seams, testable NFRs, drift control and governed architecture memory.
- Level
- Practitioner
- Learning time
- 18 hours
- Price
- $499
- Credential
- Valid 3 years
What changed in this edition.
- Auto-derived architecture is now taught as a pattern you build for your own system, with a working derive script, drift check and CI wiring — v1 pointed to internal tooling learners could not use.
- New zero-trust and audit invariants lesson, plus a worked example that reads bRRAIn's published eight-zone model as a reference zoned zero-trust architecture.
- New architecture-memory lessons: storing ADRs in the vault with record_decision and write_vault_file, retrieving them for agents with search_vault, and curating the knowledge graph with the Graph Editor.
- Six new scenario and worked-example lessons (published zero-trust zone model, tribal-knowledge harvest, prose-to-artefacts, constraint conflicts, drift triage, feature triage) for apply-and-evaluate practice.
- All nine labs are now AI role-plays with named personas and published pass criteria; the capstone is a scored design review of an architecture pack you prepare.
- Exam rebuilt to the v2 rules: 55 selected-response items and 4 rubric-scored performance tasks in 120 minutes, assembled per candidate from a fresh item bank.
What you will be able to do.
- You will be able to write ADRs that an AI agent can resume from, with conditional alternatives and enforceable consequences.
- You will be able to draw your system's zones by responsibility and trust and specify every seam with contract, direction and testable invariants, including authenticated, authorized and logged.
- You will be able to express an architecture in consistent Mermaid, YAML and graph JSON and build an auto-derive pipeline with a CI drift check.
- You will be able to encode performance, availability, security and audit requirements as measurable invariants enforced by gates or alerts.
- You will be able to detect, classify and resolve architectural drift using evolution-path notes and a docs-first refactor protocol.
- You will be able to triage new requirements by pattern-match and four axes, record trade-offs, and assign AI-driven, pair-driven or human-driven ownership.
- You will be able to run an AI-augmented design review in which humans decide and the agent records and propagates the outcome.
- You will be able to store, tag and retrieve architecture decisions in governed organizational memory so people and agents find the current reasoning.
Who it's for
- Staff and principal engineers retrofitting existing systems for AI-assisted development
- Software architects setting AI-engineering practice across an organization
- Tech leads on builds where AI agents will be long-term contributors
- Solutions architects designing integrations that AI agents will extend
Not covered here
- Personal AI coding loop (see #13 AI Coding with bRRAIn)
- Multi-contributor team flow (see #14 AI Team Development)
- Release-train design (see #15 AI SDLC & Release Train)
- bRRAIn platform SDK and product architecture (see #11 Platform Architect)
8 modules, 61 lessons.
About 18 hours of learning. Open a module to see every lesson.
-
ADRs, Zones, Seams and Zero Trust
Architecture decision records an AI can resume from; zones drawn by responsibility and trust; seams with contract, direction and invariants; zero trust restated per seam, using bRRAIn's published eight-zone model as a worked example; and harvesting tribal knowledge into ADRs.
- Pretest: ADRs, zones, seams and zero trust
- The ADR anatomy — context, decision, alternatives, consequences
- Zones as the unit of architectural reasoning
- Seams — where zones meet and the contracts they trade in
- Worked example — reading a published zoned zero-trust architecture
- Scenario — harvesting tribal knowledge before the agent re-litigates it
- Lab 1: From tribal knowledge to ADRs and a zone map
- Retrieval: 8 questions across the module
-
Machine-Readable Architecture
Mermaid, YAML and JSON Schema as architecture artefacts; the auto-derive pattern you build for your own system; one source per fact with CI consistency checks; layered context packs for agents; and a worked conversion from prose to a machine-readable set.
- Pretest: machine-readable architecture
- Mermaid diagrams as canonical architecture artefacts
- JSON / YAML schemas for structural constraints
- The auto-derive pattern — building architecture-now from your own code
- One architecture, several formats — consistency checks and agent context packs
- Worked example — from a prose architecture page to a machine-readable set
- Lab 2: One architecture in Mermaid, YAML and graph JSON
- Retrieval: 8 questions across the module
-
Constraints, NFRs and Zero-Trust Invariants
Functional and non-functional requirements as machine-readable specs; the 'AI says no' refusal pattern; performance, availability and security NFRs as testable invariants; zero-trust and audit invariants that cover AI agent callers; and evaluating constraint conflicts under delivery pressure.
- Pretest: constraints, NFRs and zero-trust invariants
- Functional vs non-functional requirements as machine-readable specs
- The 'AI says no' pattern — agents refusing changes that violate constraints
- Performance / availability / security NFRs as testable invariants
- Zero-trust and audit invariants — making security architecture testable
- Scenario — the agent says no, the deadline says yes
- Lab 3: Six NFRs as testable invariants with gates
- Retrieval: 8 questions across the module
-
Evolution, Drift and Refactor
Evolution-path notes that say what extends cleanly and what invalidates a decision; the four drift classes and how to detect each; the docs-first refactor protocol; architecture-now as a living document; and triaging a real drift report.
- Pretest: evolution, drift and refactor
- The evolution-path pattern — what extends cleanly, what doesn't
- Drift detection — when documented architecture lies
- The refactor protocol — update docs first, then code
- The 'architecture-now' living document
- Scenario — four drifts, one sweep
- Lab 4: Find the drift, write the refactor ADR
- Retrieval: 8 questions across the module
-
Pattern-Matching, Trade-offs and Ownership
The pattern-match drill; trade-off matrices an AI can read and re-score; cost, risk, reversibility and novelty as triage axes that set AI-driven, pair-driven or human-driven ownership; and triaging competing requests into a decisive recommendation.
- Pretest: pattern-matching, trade-offs and ownership
- The pattern-match drill — does this fit, with what cost?
- Trade-off matrix templates AI can read
- Cost / risk / reversibility / novelty — the architectural triage axes
- Scenario — three requests on a Monday morning
- Lab 5: Triage five inbound feature requests
- Retrieval: 8 questions across the module
-
Design Review and Architecture Memory
AI-augmented design reviews where the agent presents and humans decide; recording and propagating decisions; living-set hygiene; storing ADRs in the bRRAIn vault with record_decision and write_vault_file and retrieving them with search_vault; and curating the knowledge graph with the Graph Editor.
- Pretest: design review and architecture memory
- The AI-augmented design review — agent presents the case
- Humans decide; agent records and propagates
- The living-set hygiene practice — weekly drift sweep, quarterly retrospective
- Architecture memory — storing ADRs in the vault and retrieving them for agents
- The knowledge graph as architecture-now for what your organization knows
- Lab 6: Run an AI-augmented design review and record the decision
- Retrieval: 8 questions across the module
-
Capstone Preparation
The capstone brief, how to size the architecture pack, the seven-dimension rubric and its hard fails, the four anchor exemplars, and a calibration lab in which you score a pack like the reviewer would.
- Pretest: capstone preparation
- The capstone brief — what's given, what's required
- Capstone scope — sizing the pack so depth goes where it scores
- Capstone grading — the seven-dimension rubric and how it scores
- Anchor exemplars — what 92, 78, 71 and 54 look like
- Lab 7: Score a capstone pack like the reviewer would
- Retrieval: 7 questions across the module
-
Exam Readiness and Capstone
How the exam is built from the blueprint, pacing 59 items in 120 minutes, the most-missed item patterns, performance-task practice under exam conditions, and the capstone design review.
- Pretest: exam readiness
- How the exam is built — blueprint, item types and what each domain asks
- Timing strategy — pacing 59 items in 120 minutes
- The most-missed item types on architecture exams — patterns and recovery moves
- Lab 8: Performance-task practice under exam conditions
- Retrieval: 7 questions across the module
- Capstone: Architect and defend the Larkspur parts-and-claims subsystem
Practice against someone who pushes back.
Labs run in your browser as AI role-plays. An AI plays the person on the other side of the scenario — with their own goals and objections — and your work is scored against the published rubric. There is nothing to install.
-
Lab 1 · ADRs, Zones, Seams and Zero Trust
AI role-play: interview a principal engineer and turn tribal knowledge into three ADRs and a zone map
-
Lab 2 · Machine-Readable Architecture
AI role-play: render one architecture as zones.yaml, allowed-edges.yaml, Mermaid and graph JSON and defend consistency to a platform lead
-
Lab 3 · Constraints, NFRs and Zero-Trust Invariants
AI role-play: convert six prose requirements into NFR invariants with gates or alerts and write the agent refusal for a violation
-
Lab 4 · Evolution, Drift and Refactor
AI role-play: triage a five-item drift report with an engineering manager and author a docs-first refactor ADR
-
Lab 5 · Pattern-Matching, Trade-offs and Ownership
AI role-play: triage five feature requests for a practice-operations lead and give an ordered recommendation
-
Lab 6 · Design Review and Architecture Memory
AI role-play: run a design review with a panel chair, record the human decision with record_decision, write the ADR and plan agent retrieval
-
Lab 7 · Capstone Preparation
AI role-play: score an unfamiliar capstone pack against the published rubric with a calibration lead
-
Lab 8 · Exam Readiness and Capstone
AI role-play: two timed performance tasks (seam contract with zero-trust invariants; refactor ADR) with examiner follow-ups
-
Lab 9 · Exam Readiness and Capstone
Capstone AI role-play: present and defend an architecture pack for a new subsystem to a chief architect
Architect and defend the Larkspur parts-and-claims subsystem
AI role-play scored against the published rubric
Pass mark: 72%
Scored on
- ADR quality (AI-resumable)20%
- Zones, seams and zero-trust invariants15%
- Machine-readable consistency15%
- Constraints and NFRs as testable invariants15%
- Evolution, drift and trade-off reasoning15%
- Review conduct and ownership calls10%
- Architecture memory and living-set practice10%
One exam. A credential anyone can verify.
The exam
- Items per form
- 59
- Time allowed
- 120 min
- Pass mark
- 72%
- Performance tasks
- 4
- Attempts included
- 2
- Wait between attempts
- 7 days
- Online and timed, taken on learn.brrain.io.
- Your form is assembled for you from the course's item bank, so no two candidates sit the same paper.
- Performance tasks are conducted by an AI examiner: you work through a realistic scenario and are scored against a published rubric.
The credential
- A verifiable digital badge in your name.
- A public verification page at learn.brrain.io/verify, so an employer or client can confirm it.
- Valid for 3 years.
- Renewal: At 3 years by passing the then-current exam; completed CE modules keep the credential in good standing between renewals.
Where this course sits.
Stacks well with
Frequently asked.
Do I need to install anything for the labs?
No. Labs and the capstone run in your browser on learn.brrain.io as AI role-plays: an AI plays the person on the other side of the scenario, and your work is scored against the rubric published with the course.
How is the exam delivered?
Online and timed: 59 items in 120 minutes, on a form assembled for you from the course's item bank. 4 of the items are performance tasks conducted by an AI examiner: you do the work rather than pick an answer. The pass mark is 72%.
What if I don't pass first time?
You have 2 attempts, with a 7-day wait after an unsuccessful attempt. Further exam attempts can be bought for $299 each.
How long is the credential valid?
3 years. You receive a verifiable digital badge with a public verification page at learn.brrain.io/verify, so anyone can confirm it is genuine.
I hold the v1 credential. Is it still valid?
Yes. Credentials earned on v1 remain valid and verifiable at learn.brrain.io/verify. When you renew, you sit the then-current version of the exam.
Can my company enroll a team?
Yes. Firms can buy a certification bundle for $2,999 per firm per year — see the pricing page — or contact us to arrange enrollment for a larger group.
Related courses.
AI Augmented Systems Architect
Design systems an AI can reason about: resumable ADRs, zero-trust seams, testable NFRs, drift control and governed architecture memory.